Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method in Supporting Go Green Policies for Environmental, Economic, Social and Technological Sustainability

Dewi Wahyuni; Nurmala Sridewi

Penulis

Dewi Wahyuni Universitas Battuta Penulis
Nurmala Sridewi Universitas Battuta Penulis

Kata Kunci:

Go Green, AHP, Environmental Sustainability, Policy, Decision Analysis

Abstrak

The Go Green policy aims to create environmental, social and economic sustainability through better management of natural resources and technology. Decision making in implementing the Go Green policy requires a method that can handle various interrelated criteria. One effective method is the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), which allows the selection of policy alternatives by taking into account the main factors systematically and objectively. This research applies the AHP method to evaluate Go Green policy alternatives based on four main criteria: environmental, economic, social and technological sustainability. The analysis results show that the use of renewable energy is the best policy that can support the implementation of Go Green with a score of 0.50.

Referensi

Rohim F, WD, & SA. Evaluating Green Policies: The Role of Sustainability Criteria in Environmental Planning. J Environ Manage. 2020;45(4):56–70.

Perez D, OP, & TJ. Green Policy Development Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: The Role of Sustainability in Urban Planning. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2019;50(101657).

Miller D, BM, & PS. Challenges and Opportunities in Green Economy Transition. Ecological Economics. 2021;78:52–65.

Ahmad F, & AM. Renewable Energy Solutions for Sustainable Development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2019;85–101.

Elhag T, & HT. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Environmental Planning: A Case Study of Sustainable Waste Management. Environ Eng Sci. 2020;37(12):932–46.

Saaty TL. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, and Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill. 1980.

Muralidhar K, RM, & VB. AHP for Environmental Decision Making: A Case Study of Waste Management Policies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;8(12):654–67.

Chang NB, & LCH. AHP-based Sustainable Decision Making for Renewable Energy Policy Selection. J Environ Manage. 2019;228:195–203.

Wang W, HX, & ZJ. Sustainable Energy Systems for Smart Cities: A Case Study of Renewable Energy Implementation. Energy Reports. 2020;6:233–40.

Sutrisno S, IB, & PA. Green Economy: Policies and Implementation Strategies for Sustainable Development. . Journal of Green Development. 2021;35(2):22–35.

Liu L, ZW, & ZY. Sustainability in Urban Planning: Achieving Green Growth through Smart Technologies. Sustain Cities Soc. 2018;41:72–83.

Goh M, SW, & TK. Evaluation of Green Technologies in Sustainable Building Design. Build Environ. 2017;125:111–22.

Bertinelli L, & SP. Sustainable Development: An Economic Approach. Routledge. 2019.

McDaniel RR, & SSA. AHP-based Decision Support in Environmental Management: An Empirical Study. Environmental Management. 2000;26(3):121–32.

Mula J, CC, & LY. AHP-based Sustainable Energy Planning for Green Urban Development. Renew Energy. 2013;50:404–15.

Saaty TL. Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Services Sciences. 2008;1(1):83–98.

Zhao X, ZY, & XL. Energy Efficiency and Environmental Impact Reduction through Green Technologies. . Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2019;70:122–38.